At first
glance, the new Terminal 2 at the Guangzhou Baiyun International Airport comes
across as a elegant technological marvel. It has a polished, ultra-modern feel with
high ceilings, open spaces, sparkling storefronts and the latest in high-tech
digital hardware. But as you walk through it, you realize there isn’t much life
inside. The floors are a cold, gleaming granite and the commercial space is
filled with stores selling luxury brands, a few restaurants and coffee shops, and
one convenience store.
The lower your income bracket, the fewer places you have to hang out, which is a problem if you’re seeking to create a welcoming, inclusive environment for travelers. There is none of the vibrant energy you find in other airports in other parts of Asia or Europe or the U.S., with hip restaurants, bars and stores catering to travelers of more modest means.
The lower your income bracket, the fewer places you have to hang out, which is a problem if you’re seeking to create a welcoming, inclusive environment for travelers. There is none of the vibrant energy you find in other airports in other parts of Asia or Europe or the U.S., with hip restaurants, bars and stores catering to travelers of more modest means.
Terminal 2,
like many other of the new structures being built in China, could serve as a
metaphor for the kind of civil society China is building, one that is carefully
constructed from the top down and looks beautiful on the outside but lacks the
energy and life that comes from the engagement of individuals and groups having
ideas to express and problems to address. Both Terminal 2 and China’s present civil society are like someone’s utilitarian fantasy or nightmare. Why would
someone construct structures like this, a society like this? I would suggest the
impetus has more to do with conveying strength and imposing order and control and
less with expressing or satisfying human needs and desires.
This civil
society present represents a significant departure from civil society past which
is the civil society that was emerging prior to the new era ushered in by the supreme
architect-in-chief, President Xi Jinping. While control and repression by the
state was a part of life before Xi, grassroots groups of different shapes and
sizes found soil to take root in and grow, like weeds in a well-tended lawn. It
was a stunted civil society but nevertheless one with a human core. More importantly,
it was a civil society building the necessary foundation to begin a dialogue
with the state on the country’s future. There were environmentalists taking on air
pollution and monitoring Chinese investment overseas, public interest lawyers representing
workers stricken with pneumoconiosis and Falun Gong practitioners, performance
art by feminists and anti-discrimination activists fighting against sexual
harassment and discriminatory hiring practices, labor activists training
workers on labor law and collective bargaining, and NGOs calling for equal access
to education for migrant children.
Under
President Xi, civil society has undergone
a makeover and the product as it appears in the year 2018 is as impressive
as it is disheartening. Terminal 2 comes to mind when surveying civil society
present and the civil society that might come to pass – civil society future. The
building blocks for this makeover are now familiar to many and have been
documented in this blog over the last few years:
n the passage of more restrictive laws
and regulations governing foreign NGOs, charity, social organizations,
religion, volunteers;
n the provision of state funds to
outsource services by social organizations and the creation of government-supported
incubators and development centers to guide “social construction”;
n the closing down of independent civic
groups engaged in activism and advocacy and house churches, and the arrest of human
rights lawyers, feminists, labor activists, environmentalists, and ministers
over the last four years;
n the requirement for all social forces
to submit to the orthodoxy of Marxism-Leninism and the leadership of the
Communist Party
I witnessed these changes in my many conversations
with activists and NGOs in China in 2018. Some
activists had headed underground for cover. Others were seeking to remake
themselves by registering as social organizations working on community and
charitable issues like providing services to migrant families or helping the
elderly and disabled. Many NGOs, unable to get support from overseas donors due to restrictions imposed by the Overseas NGO Law, had difficulty finding funding. To my surprise, many were now relying heavily on funding from the government. Other more pragmatic types were looking to
start new business models like social enterprises. Still others continued to
hold out either because they chose not to go after government funding or because they were on a blacklist and were unable to register as a social organization, which was a prerequisite for applying for government funding. A common
refrain I heard from my NGO friends was, “At least we’re alive. We see that as a
victory.”
Their persistence
is a bright spot in an otherwise dismal year. In one of the biggest crackdowns on labor groups, police and security forces rounded up workers, students and
labor activists involved in the Jasic Technology factory protests in the
southern metropolis of Shenzhen. Many of the students were self-identified Marxists from top universities
like Beijing University and Renmin University. There were also a few
elderly Maoists who joined the mix.
The Jasic case
epitomizes the moral bankruptcy of the Xi regime which seeks to impress,
control and terrorize yet has no ideological or moral core of its own. The
striking irony of Xi’s “new era of socialism with Chinese characteristics”
should not be lost on anyone. A regime that is building the most formidable
Marxist edifice of the 21st century rejects the Marxist appeal of
students and Maoists to support workers in their struggle against capital.
I’d like to
end my last post of 2018 on a bright note with a reminder that next year marks
the 100th and 30th anniversaries of two important historical
mileposts in the development of China’s contemporary civil society: the May 4th
Movement of 1919 and the June 4th Movement of 1989 respectively. Civil
society future has a long way to go to recapture the moral core of these
movements, but let’s hope it can take baby steps in that direction in 2019.
The comparison with Guangzhou's airport is a great way of describing current Chinese civil society.
ReplyDeleteI would only take issue with one point: the regime isn't building the "most formidable Marxist edifice of the 21st century". There is nothing Marxist about this regime, by any reasonable definition of Marxism.
Jixiang, thank you and yes that is why I said it's a great irony. It's only Marxist on the surface, with lots of talk about Marxism, but the regime's policies and actions are a long way from Marxist.
ReplyDelete